| TRHBlogs a strange sort of community | |
 | |
A collection of rants, mostly about relationships and my various emotional problems
On pornography August 29, 2005 - 23:01:51
Today for your reading pleasure, I will be reviewing "Exibitionists" directed by Andrew Blake. It's weird watching porn alone. I've only ever watched porn a couple times, and it's been with friends. The first time it was with my friend Linda, watching porn her boy had given her, and the other time was with Lizzery and Genny, when we were sitting in Lizzery's basement, watching porn while clad only in blankets (but that's a story for another day). So I was talking with Michael, Sean's roommate because we don't really ever get a chance to hang out. Of course eventually the topic of conversation comes to sex, the taboos, our current sex lives, and porn. He grabs one of his porn movies, so I can watch it and see what I think of it. The first thought is that I'd borrow it, take it to school so I can watch it on my computer, and then when Sean visits again hand it to him and see his face. Then Michael goes to hang out with another friend of his, leaving me alone for a few hours until Sean gets home, so I decide to watch it now. So yes, watching porn alone is weird, although it might be even more weird watching it with someone that I'm not dating. That's on my list of things to do eventually maybe, watch porn as a couple, see how that works. Anyway, I wasn't that big a fan of it all. First it took me a while to figure out how to actually get the DVD to play, as they have three remotes, and I couldn't find the right TV/VCR button (it was actually the one on the TV I needed to press). Then there was no sound. I'm not sure whether there was supposed to be or not, as it makes some sense having silent porn, so you can watch it and someone in the other room won't know that's what you're doing, but maybe there was another mute button I was supposed to press so I could hear all the moany noises that everyone so adores. Of the porn itself, it was ok. A bit long, as it was just a lot of scenes of four girls in various combinations, together, paired, and alone. I don't really like porn to be that long without a plot. At first it was arousing, but then it just got a bit boring. There's only so much just sex I can watch. The sex itself was a bit meh. I would have liked more oral sex, but that might be just because that's my main form of sexual activity. As far as finger play goes, they seemed to be manipulating an area above the clitoris, so I don't know why that would be so good, and when there was insertion it was only one finger, up to the second knuckle. I don't know about anyone else, but that's not really enough for me. So yeah, the sex didn't look all that satisfying to me, but I might just be weird or something. The scenery was pretty, it all took place in this big victorian house or something, there were fireplaces, ornate furniture, and gardens with stone walls. That was nice to look at, at least. Some of the outfits were cute, some of them were weird. I liked the corsets, but I like corsets. The girls were attractive, with breasts a little to large for my tastes. That could be because they were all thin, so they looked bigger by comparison, or maybe I like smaller breasts. Not hippy enough, I guess, so it looked off balance? I like girls with curves- breasts out, waist in and hips out. A couple of them had long nails, and that turned me off because while long nails feel good running over the body, they do not feel good in more sensitive areas where the fingertips are supposed to be doing delicate things. So that is what I think of that porn. I just thought you would all be interested in my opinion on that. - Kitty |
